Archive for Category: indian gaming regulatory act

Homeindian gaming regulatory act
Posted on September 5, 2023
/
/ Indigenous World

New Mexico Federal Court [Browning, J.] Holds State Courts Do Not Possess Jurisdiction over Tort Claims Brought against Tribal Gaming but Federal Courts Have No Jurisdiction to Do Anything About It

Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. Biedsheid (D.N.M.): 18 Amended Complaint.pdfDownload 36-1 Buffalo Thunder MSJ.pdfDownload 41 Peña Opposition.pdfDownload 43 Biedsheid Opposition.pdfDownload 44

District of New Mexico, IGRA, Indian gaming, indian gaming regulatory act, Pueblo of Pojoaque v. Biedsheid, state court jurisdiction, tribal courts, Turtletalk.blog, United-States Indigenous News

Read More
Posted on February 22, 2023
/
/ Indigenous World

Washington Federal Court Dismisses Constitutional Challenge to Washington Class III Compacts Allowing Tribal Sports Betting

DALL-E’s interpretation of “tribal sovereign immunity” Here is the order in Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States (W.D. Wash.): 98-dct-orderDownload Briefs here.

IGRA, Indian gaming, indian gaming regulatory act, Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States, Rule 19, Shoalwater Bay Tribe, sovereign immunity, tribal sovereign immunity, Turtletalk.blog, United-States Indigenous News, Western District of Washington

Read More
Posted on October 26, 2022
/
/ Indigenous World

Update in Maverick Gaming Challenge to IGRA — New Venue and Rule 19 Motion to Dismiss

Here are the new materials in Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States (W.D. Wash.): 66 Amended Complaint.pdfDownload 68-1 Shoalwater Motion to Dismiss.pdfDownload 85 Shoalwater Bay

IGRA, Indian gaming, indian gaming regulatory act, Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States, Research, Rule 19, sovereign immunity, tribal sovereign immunity, Turtletalk.blog, United-States Indigenous News, Western District of Washington

Read More
Posted on May 27, 2020
/
/ Indigenous World

Ninth Circuit Rejects Two Challenges to North Fork Rancheria Gaming

Here is the opinion in Club One Casino, Inc. v. Bernhardt. Briefs here. And here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept.

Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Class III Gaming Compact, Class III Procedures, Club One Casino Inc. v. Bernhardt, Club One Casino Inc. v. Dept. of Interior, Eastern District of California, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, indian gaming regulatory act, Ninth Circuit, North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians, oral argument, Research, Secretarial procedures, Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of the Interior, Turtletalk.blog, United-States Indigenous News

Read More
© 2021 Indigenous World All rights reserved. WordPress Web Design & Development by NOBL Web.